Now, that is a word that is not often used in our largely
agnostic, but still nominally Christian West. I had to look it up to refresh
myself as to the exact meaning. It had been spoken by my dear old friend Michael
Winter, above, who was a Catholic priest before he left the priesthood around
the same time as his friend and fellow anti-nuclear campaigner Monsignor Bruce
Kent. He had been the priest who instructed
me when I became a Catholic more than thirty years ago. He married and is now
the father of two grown sons.
According to the Oxford dictionary the word comes from
Middle English: from ecclesiastical Latin apostata, from Greek apostatēs
‘deserter, runaway slave, apostate’. Abandoning a religious or
political belief or principle.
I have been thinking a lot about this question ever since
the Swedish hostage Johan Gustavsson was released on the 26th of June this
year. He had been abducted in Timbuktu in November 2011 together with a South
African and a Dutch national. Their German friend was shot dead as he resisted
being taken captive. I remember this very well- my friend Karen called me at the hotel in Djenné from
Bamako and told me the news : it was the end for Malian tourist trade
and it heralded the beginning of Mali’s
descent into the largely non-functioning state it has become, riven by
insecurity and effectively lacking state presence in more than half its
territory. Aqmi- Al Quaida in the Maghreb- claimed the attack.
Gustavsson had fared better than his Dutch companion Rijke
who was freed in April 2015 by the French special Barkane forces that are now stationed in the vast desert areas
across northern Mali, Niger and Mauritania. Rijke had apparently become brainwashed
and had adopted Islam. His reunion with his family and wife was not a success,
at least to start with. Gustavsson gave a press conference finally and and he
was lucid and confident, clearly joyful
to be back and seemingly able to resume normal life once more.
Gustavsson
apparently comes from a religious home, quite an unusual upbringing for a
modern Swede. He admitted during the
Press conference that he had made a ‘pretend’ conversion : »I told
them that I wanted to convert to Islam. That was the only thing I could think
of that would buy me time, even though I did not have much hope that it would
work » His ‘conversion’ brought him some freedom in the camp, where he
prayed with his captors and was able to walk around freely, as one of them.
I have thought a lot about this recently as I have conducted an informal investigation amongst
my friends- some believers, some agnostics. « What would you do ?»
was the question I asked.
Gustavsson committed Apostasy, in fact . And not under
any threat of being killed : he sought it out himself in order to improve
his chances of survival. His behavior has not needed to be excused to
anyone : the large majority of the agnostic, educated liberals who create the opinions of the West,
if they have thought about it at all they have have not only understood, they have applauded his talent
for survival. And yet, not so long ago, and not so far away,
thousands of people were willing to die for their beliefs : the Armenian
and Greek genicides by the Ottomans in the first world war is but one example.
Scorcese’s latest film ‘The Silence’ deals with this very problem : the persecution of the Christians in Japan in the sixteenth century, and the apostasy of a Jesuit Priest.
And if we go back to the persecutions of the early
Christians which culminated with the reign of Diocletian at the end of the third
century AD the estimates vary wildly of how many died : figures between
10000 to 100000 are quoted by scholars. When Constantine I came to power in 313
he legalized Christianity. There were many
other persecutions of
Christians : Tamerlane instigated large scale massacres of Christians in
Mesopotamia, Persia and Syria in the 14th century AD.
But as Michael Winter pointed out : they were not all martyrs. Maybe a majority decided to apostatize ? We will never know. The early Church had means of dealing with this of course. Michael told me that a Christian who had renounced Christ, under pressure or under any other circumstances, would be unable to partake of Holy Communion for five years. If, after this time had lapsed, they had proven themselves still willing to return to the flock, they were finally accepted.
But as Michael Winter pointed out : they were not all martyrs. Maybe a majority decided to apostatize ? We will never know. The early Church had means of dealing with this of course. Michael told me that a Christian who had renounced Christ, under pressure or under any other circumstances, would be unable to partake of Holy Communion for five years. If, after this time had lapsed, they had proven themselves still willing to return to the flock, they were finally accepted.
I think that perhaps it is persecution that brings out the
martyrs. In ordinary times when noone cares what one believes any more it seems
an irrelevant question. Or is it ?
After the release of Gustavsson, Margot Wallstrom, the
Swedish Foreign Minister said that it was the result of "several years of
efforts" by police, politicians, diplomats and Swedish and international
authorities. One of these diplomats was of course my friend Eva, the Swedish
Ambassador to Mali, whom I knew to be carrying out weekly meetings with the Malian government’s
security officers regarding this matter, although she was never able to breathe
a word to me of what happened at these meetings of course. Eva, like the urbane and modern Swede that she
is, thought that Gustavsson’s behavior was perfectly unassailable.
I had asked Fr. Columba, the Benedictine monk and my collegue and sponsor in the Timbuktu project what he would have done. « Well I would hope I wouldn’t denounce Christ ! » he replied.
Eva, who knows and likes him said « Yes, but he is a professional ! » My old priest Michael also said that he hoped that he wouldn’t deny Christ. He may not be a priest any longer but he has certainly not lost his faith.
I had asked Fr. Columba, the Benedictine monk and my collegue and sponsor in the Timbuktu project what he would have done. « Well I would hope I wouldn’t denounce Christ ! » he replied.
Eva, who knows and likes him said « Yes, but he is a professional ! » My old priest Michael also said that he hoped that he wouldn’t deny Christ. He may not be a priest any longer but he has certainly not lost his faith.
And what about apostasy in Islam ? Those that believe
in Charia law think that someone who does not believe in Allah should be
executed. The Maliki school of Islamic jurisprudence (which is the branch of
Sunni Islam which is practised in West Africa) advocates up to ten days for
recantation, after which the apostate- male or female- must be killed.
Fortunately Mali is still a secular state…
Apostasy would belong in Circle 6 of Dante’s Inferno : the place reserved for for heretics. Inferno has Nine circles, the first being Limbo, the place for those who never knew Christ because they came from another time and place (this includes Virgil, his guide).
(I can't help it: let me digress : the second Circle of
Inferno is where the real punishments begin, the first (and therefore the most
minor of the mortal sins for Dante) is lust, a place for lovers such as
Francesca di Rimini with her Paolo, eternally condemned to whirl around in a
great wind of flames... And here they are in the fabulous painting by the Romantic
painter Ary Scheffer at the Wallace collection where I went with Andrew last
Sunday…)
So what does Christ himself say about those who commits
apostasy ?
“I am the vine, you are the
branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. If anyone
does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they
gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned. » John 15, 1-6
Harsh words, but then let's not forget there is also the Prodigal Son’s return and the Shepherd's search to retrieve the lost sheep...
Harsh words, but then let's not forget there is also the Prodigal Son’s return and the Shepherd's search to retrieve the lost sheep...
God spends a lot of time in the Old Testament nagging the unfaithful Israelites through His prophets to come back to Him,
thereby seemingy giving some hope of a happy reunion :
« Come
back disloyal Israel- it is Yahweh who speaks-
I
shall not frown on you no more,
Since
I am merciful-it is Yahweh who speaks.
I
shall not keep my resentment forever.
Only
acknowledge your guilt :
How
you have apostatised from Yahweh your God,
How
you have flirted with strangers
And
have not listened to my voice- it is Yahweh who speaks » Jeremiah 3-12
I asked some of my friends who
are practising Catholics: Clare, Andrew and John Wilkins: ‘What would it
matter if one said one was a Muslim to save one’s life if taken captive ?
What good would it do anyone if one were to be martyred quite unnecessarily far out in the
desert ? Would God really require that ?
I had expected that they would
say that it would probably not matter, but I was wrong. They came to the
conclusion that it would be going against one’s core, the centre of one’s existence.
To denounce Christ, for a committed
believer, could do irreparable damage
and would be deeply destructive to one soul, or in other words cause deep
psychological damage.
But then I asked my dear Irish Catholic friend Kathy. She
believed it would not matter : God would forgive. And all believers
believe in the same God after all, she said.
I have quite a personal reason for these theological
meanderings : travelling to
Timbuktu does undoubtedly carry some dangers now. I will go back in December.
Kidnapping is not a a far distant, theoretical danger but quite real.
How would I react ? Would I commit apostasy ? If necessary I could easily pretend to be a Muslim : I spent days and nights by Keita’s death bed, at his request repeating the Islamic confession of faith for him : La Ilahail Allah, aisha du Anna Mohammed Rasul Allai- there is but one God and Mohammed is His Prophet.
I could perhaps say that and they would leave me alone ? And if I only added Isa to it then it would be almost what I beleve : There is but one God and Mohammed and Isa (Jesus, he is regarded as a Prophet in Islam) are his prophets ? Hmmm… It still doesn’t quite work, but let’s hope I will never have to try it out….
How would I react ? Would I commit apostasy ? If necessary I could easily pretend to be a Muslim : I spent days and nights by Keita’s death bed, at his request repeating the Islamic confession of faith for him : La Ilahail Allah, aisha du Anna Mohammed Rasul Allai- there is but one God and Mohammed is His Prophet.
I could perhaps say that and they would leave me alone ? And if I only added Isa to it then it would be almost what I beleve : There is but one God and Mohammed and Isa (Jesus, he is regarded as a Prophet in Islam) are his prophets ? Hmmm… It still doesn’t quite work, but let’s hope I will never have to try it out….
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSeems inexplicable to me that anyone - least of all Christ - would find it anything but understandable to say one thing to save one's life and keep one strong that didn't harm others (you know the only commandment according to one of the main characters in Nabokov's Pale Fire - 'thou shalt not do harm to others'. Actually 'thou shalt not kill' is the other, but that seems to me to come under the same category). What you keep inside you is what your faith is. Your/our friends begin to look like i fanatici to me. This is what would put me off being part of a religious community.
ReplyDeleteI knew that what I have written here would not be easily understood by those who do not believe David. I do think you are quite wrong to call me and my friends fanatics though
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBut you don't believe that what the noble Swede did to get by was apostasy, do you? Your remarks seem to suggest that you don't. I just think that what you're telling me is a clear case of where religion puts dogma over humanity. And after all Islam, Judaism and Christianity all share the same God - the Koran makes that very clear in Book One. All is one.
ReplyDeleteWell, David, what he did WAS exactly that by definition of the word. There is no getting away from it. I suppose what I am asking here is whether that is OK for a believer
ReplyDeleteunder certain circumstances. I dont expect an unbeliever to find anything wrong with it. But I believe that I have the right to mull such things over without being called a fanatic.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou miss my point and ignore a few of the other things I brought up along the way. My main objection was this, where you posed a question and the way three of your friends responded made me bristle, especially the nonsense about 'denouncing Christ'. When there are so many real evils facing us, it strikes me there just isn't time for this antiquated irrelevance. I quote again. Of course I agree one hundred per cent with Kathy, who put it more temperately than I, no doubt:
ReplyDelete'I asked some of my friends who are practising Catholics...: ‘What would it matter if one said one was a Muslim to save one’s life if taken captive ? What good would it do anyone if one were to be martyred quite unnecessarily far out in the desert ? Would God really require that ?
'I had expected that they would say that it would probably not matter, but I was wrong. They came to the conclusion that it would be going against one’s core, the centre of one’s existence. To denounce Christ, for a committed believer, could do irreparable damage and would be deeply destructive to one soul, or in other words cause deep psychological damage.
'But then I asked my dear Irish Catholic friend Kathy. She believed it would not matter : God would forgive. And all believers believe in the same God after all, she said.'
Dear David, I do not believe I am missing any points. We are going to have to differ on this. For a committed Christian, it is a valid question to ask, and it is not 'antiquated nonsense'. Please step back and listen to yourself. You would NEVER allow yourself to call anything that Muslims preach 'antiquated nonsense'. Why can you not show a Christian the same courtesy? 'Denouncing Christ' means nothing to those who do not believe but it does pose a problem to those who do. Or at least it should do! Some things shuld perhaps remain sacred? Or at least we should at least ask ourself the question? You are yourself seemingly missing the point: I am not actually advocating anything here: I am simply allowing myself to ask questions.
ReplyDeleteI would call the hangovers from a long-past age in both Christianity and Islam 'antiquated nonsense'. I respect what's pertinent to humanity as a code of conduct on this earth in both. And you clearly didn't take on board that I did NOT regard lifesaving measures as 'denouncing Christ' (again, a melodramatic and old-fashioned phrase). Nor much else. But enough - I step back and hope that others might add their voices now.
ReplyDelete