Thursday, March 1, 2018

Guida in encounters with Jihadists and Malian Army..



Guida Landoure  landed himself in trouble the other day when he visited Central Mali for a family wedding. I have translated –with some abridging and paraphrasing- once more his Facebook report of a potentially lethal encounter. (Picture above for illustration only) When first reading his account, I confess to being a little dismayed at what seems like a sympathetic response to the terrorists. But Guida here is not in favour of terrorism, he is high-lighting the reasons for the defection to these groups – poverty and ideology- the last of these being  persuasive, since the Malian Army is very corrupt, undoubtedly, the state is weak and the Macina group seems to offer an alternative: a purer vision of existence, however narrow to our Western eyes. Central Mali is not alien to these purifying movements: they were not invented by AQMI or Al Quaida. The ‘Macina’ (the Niger Inland Delta) experienced two great such movements in the 19th century, the first being Sekou Amadou’s Fulani Empire, followed by El Hadj Umar Tall and his Toucouleur Empire.

Guida’s conclusion, after his trials, is once again a plea for dialogue.


So, the day before the departure for the wedding we find Guida arriving in Djenne:


“As usual I went to play cards with my friends at night. There was no mention of insecurity although the threat is clearly there, nearby. Perhaps they were preoccupied by other problems such as the approach of the dry season; the increasing price of rice or the lack of fish because of the drop in water levels this year.
In the morning we got on our way to cross to the other side of the Niger. After about 75 km, we arrived close by the river. We needed to get out of the vehicle to avoid the risk of getting stuck. Walking in the sand, a motorcyclist came towards us. He asked us where we came from, where we were going and why. We answered calmly and politely. But once he had passed, I noticed Arabic writings on the back of his long beige coat. I did not need to dwell on the words that were written to understand what they said.   I knew that the unspoken rule was that I did not see or hear anything.  When we arrived at the edge of the river, he came back with another motorcyclist, this one armed. The same questions were put to us and the same answers given. We were instructed to tell no one what we had seen.  Of course we had  seen nothing...
 
We now thought that the problem had passed but soon another group of three men heavily armed and carrying their black flag approached from the other side of the shore in a canoe. We were all made to sit on the sand; they took up the sitting position they used when they were talibés in the Koran school. The leader put his weapon over his shoulder and shook our hands. The same questions were asked again and the same answers given. He checked our identity documents. He asked us to excuse him for a moment while he called his leader "since we are only envoys". He went behind our vehicle and phoned his boss. Moments later, he came back and asked one of the others to accompany him to check inside the vehicle. We heard this last one say that he was a witness that our vehicle had been checked without touching anything.

This control over, their leader came back to us to explain the reason for their struggle. He
 insisted that their fight is not ethnic and that it is not for the conquest of territory. Their only 
fight is the "dina": the establishment of Sharia- religious law. He rebuked my older brother for 
having filled up a vehicle to go and celebrate a wedding and all of us for being dressed like 
Jews or Christians: no one could tell the difference between us and the enemies they try and 
root out: those who are out to kill them too. 
He told us that we had taken a great risk in entering this area without due precaution and that 
this action could in fact be considered suicidal. When he had finished his sermon he gave us
 back our identity cards and said that he could not guarantee our safe arrival at our 
destination because he did not know if we were going to meet others on the way who may not
 be so understanding. Before leaving us, he asked us to forgive them for stopping us three 
times. His attitude was not one of indifference- he did not want to leave without apologizing.
 
When he went to mount his motorcycle I approached him, asking him if I could give them my 
point of view. He replied: "No problem". I could not let this opportunity slip by: I had dreamed of
 it, just like I had dreamed of meeting Ras Bath[i] –this has now also happened- to tell them 
what I think. 
I said that I think they are wrong to treat people on outward appearance. Whether men shave
 or not or wear short or long clothes does not reflect their piety. Such matters are just details 
and unworthy of so much opposition. I told him that their insistence on appearance is back 
firing on their intentions. He smiled and said "salam lafia" (peace and relax) I now wanted to go
 onto deeper matters, but my companions, happy to be able to escape without incident, were
 summoning me to come, Also, the ferry had arrived. I hope to have another opportunity and
 then to meet those at the top. 
 
From these meetings, I retain 3 personalities who could throw some light on the situation we
 are experiencing:
 
1.      The leader, the one who was in charge of the control seemed very convinced, he
 preached with faith and was trying to convince us of the merits of their fight. He remained 
courteous and amiable : he wanted to seduce us.
2.      One of the two who were stationed in front of us with a handgun kept moving
 restlessly, often replying to my brother who was saying that we had no bad intentions
 and that we were not representative of the state. He seemed to be praying that something
 would go wrong in order to be able to satiate his hatred which was almost palpable.  When
 he answered my big brother, the chief told him to shut up. He did not utter another word. 
A sign of discipline.
3.      The 3rd, very calm, remained silent, as if he were praying that nothing would go 
wrong. Possible all that mattered to him was his salary: that was  the only reason he was
 there at all. 
 
 After this checkpoint, no further worries.
Once we arrived at our destination, a town that has experienced many attacks, there was no 
check point control at the entrance although the army was there: we saw a few 100-200m 
behind a barricade of tyres. In the town the tension was palpable. ‘They’ were there, we saw it 
in the eyes of some and others went so far as to mutter  "the dogs have arrived to town": words
 they attribute to all who do not look like them. 
The wedding took place behind closed doors, there was not even the traditional cries of the 
‘griots’[1]. 

For our return to Djenne we decided to go through a town controlled by the Malian army. At the 
entrance of this town, on seeing the Malian soldier advancing, I was more afraid than at the 
sight of the "jihadists", maybe for fear of reacting badly considering all that I have seen of the
 military’s behaviour. But now an unfortunate event diverted us from a full check point control
 since our engine was pouring out oil. But we saw the soldier searching our vehicle alone
 inside, unlike the "jihadist" who wanted a witness. (Sorry, I only make observations here).
 
In Koutiala, in a hurry to return to the calm of the south, our driver did not pay attention to the
 checkpoint stop and we were stopped by policemen. We explained our misadventure and our
 behaviour but they still wanted us to ‘give them the price of tea’. The "jihadists" asked for
 nothing, only to ensure our identity. We refused the police men's  try for a bribe and wanted
 to pay the fine (which involves going to their superiors in company with one of them)  but they policemen
refused  to leave. We now threatened to tell their boss and they mockingly  encouraged us
 to go tell their minister. Here too, the opposite of the "jihadist", respectful of his superior. One
 could start wondering  who are  terrorizing us!
 
My idea is that we should not be afraid to talk to them and that war is not a solution especially
 since we do not know who exactly we are dealing with. We can silence them for a moment, but this
 war, which is fought for reasons of ideology and religious belief cannot be won by arms. They
 have points on which we can agree. For example the great cost and waste of money in 
weddings; the cessation of taxes that certain notables are enforcing for the grass grazed on
 the plains. etc 
But there are certain things that are not negotiable, such as the impossibility of  abolishing the
 school system. 
Again I reaffirm that these tensions will only be eased by dialogue and the restoration of social 
justice. We did not recognize that with the rebellion and now we have to negotiate back to the
 wall.
As soon as I am President, I will start direct negotiations. 
They are Malians, not monsters.
Have a good day!
Guida Landoure





[1] The traditional West African’minstrels’ or Praise Singers.


[i] Ras Bath is a Malian Rasta DJ, a whistleblower for government corruption and malpractise-  a very controversial figure and a thorn in the flesh for the Malian elite.

5 comments:

  1. There should be NO place in the world for Sharia law as I understand it. It is out of step with moderate islam and indeed the first book of the Quran. 62 explicitly states 'The believers, the Jews, the Christians and the Sabaeans -all those who believe in God and the Last Day and do good deeds - will be rewarded by their Lord; they shall have no fear, nor shall they grieve'. I should also hope that today, even those who do NOT believe but who 'do good deeds' do not need to fear true Islam. There is also constant talk of compassion and mercy. Guida, beautifully though he writes, and these extremists, would do well to remember this. Also 256: 'there shall be no compulsion in religion'; 271: 'It is not your responsibility to make [non-believers] follow the right path'. But I need to read beyond Book 2 for contradictions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, of course, David, but I think the point here is HOW do we get out of this situation in central Mali? It seems to be slightly different than the northern situation in that the people involved seems to be exclusively locals, but in the northern part there is infiltration of a wider group, including Algerians etc.) I believe that he is right in advocating dialogue. IBK is totally against dialogue but day by day the state is growing weaker and he doesn't seem to have any ideas on how to solve the situation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree, my remarks weren't addressing the specific situation in Mali. But remember how when we came it was all about Mali's moderate form of Islam? Whatever happened to that? And are these men up for dialogue or are their demands absolute?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is very difficult and complicated. Islam in Mali is-was- indeed an altogether gentler form,as you rightly say. Malians in general are really quite a tolerant bunch. BUT there has always been this strain of Islamic crusading - mostly led by the Fulani nomads who have been doing periodic Jihads since the eighteenth century all over the western Sahel. Now it is of course mixed up with the influence both from the Wahabist Saudis and Quataris who have infiltrated Mali in their 'legal' way, and the influence from the Al Quaida linked groups who spread their message covertly or with force.There are definitely Jihadists and Jihadists: I think it is a mistake to tar these Central Mali troublemakers with the same brush as Boko Haram, for instance, and perhaps not quite Isis either. Perhaps there is some way of talking? I don't know what I think. I do not believe that the government has any idea of how to deal with the situation, and the vast international UN presence has not really helped to stabilize the country either. Although the peace accord was signed two and a half years ago, there is much less peace in Mali now than when it was signed. There must be some new way , some new initiative in how to deal with it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. and the answer to whether they are up for dialogue and whether their demands are absolute- indeed, I don't know-
    I am not sure whether there has been any overtures made by the 'Haute Conseil Islamic' of Mali
    - they said they would be trying. I will try and find out...

    ReplyDelete