Take this referendum in Ireland on abortion for instance. It
is unthinkable for anyone in my circle to feel that abortion should be anything
but totally optional and ‘a woman’s right’.
Now, if I were Irish, I would have voted yes. Because I
think that it is untenable that Ireland should remain isolated with different
laws to the rest of Europe.
But that doesn’t mean that I don’t feel the whole question
of abortion is deeply fraught.
When I was eighteen years old I had an abortion. At the time
I cannot remember there was even the slightest question whether my boyfriend
and I should keep the baby. That simply didn’t enter the equation. I come from
Sweden. Abortion had been freely available there for decades. We just got rid
of our baby as if it had been a case of brushing off a piece of fluff from the
collar of my coat.
I was never able to have a baby again. Something must have
gone wrong somehow. That is of course extremely rare. I have not mourned the
fact that I remained childless-but sometimes the thought crosses my mind: what
if...? How would my life had looked if we had kept the baby? But we never even
gave it a thought.
I sometimes wonder how the living children of rape feel
about the fact that everyone says that it should be an inalienable right for
the mother to abort a pregnancy caused by rape.
Edward St Aubyn’s great Melrose novels may never be with us. He was the
result of rape. I know Tess of the D’Urbervilles
is fiction, but I feel it has poetic truth: Tess called her child Sorrow but did
not love her child less because it was spawned by rape.
A long time ago at one of my dinner parties in Islington the
conversation around the table turned to the subject of abortion. Since we were
all born before the 1967 Abortion act, it would not have been so easy to have been
granted an abortion at the time of our birth. A third of the people present
said they thought they would simply not have made it into the world if abortion
had been as readily available as it is now!
My own case from Sweden is the
opposite: my father died before my birth, before my mother knew of her
pregnancy- probably a few hours after my conception. They were to marry the following Sunday, but
he was killed by a car accident. So my
mother found herself in the situation of
becoming an unmarried mother.
Blinded and half mad by grief she was taken to a hospital by my grandparents.
She was given a paper to sign. She was just about to sign it without knowing
what it was, but then something stopped her and she looked closer at the paper:
it was her consent form to an abortion. She threw the pen away and screamed NO!
apparently. That is why I am here...
Gosh, that all makes moving reading. But without such going public, how would we understand the general from the specific? xx
ReplyDeleteEvery case of abortion is a specific case and has a story to it that deserves considering carefully. I guess I am just concerned that to even breathe the smallest whisper that the unborn baby should be considered in any way is unacceptable and makes people regard one as some sort of reactionary fossil... But,having said that, I would have voted YES after all.
ReplyDeletesomething I can not understand:
ReplyDeleteContemporary western civilization defends unconditionally, always, the weaker side, those who need support: national minorities, freedom of sexual preferences, unemployed etc. We are proud of it, it is our way. And here is the exception: unborn children. Because they can not talk? because they do not resemble a man? But if any parent dies, these cells, this fetus, inherits the fortune from him, right? So? Is it not about ordinary comfort?
Great text S., as usually.
Wow, Sophie. Reading this I realize I should keep up with your blog much more regularly. Moving, honest piece of writing. Besides, I´ve given a thought to this issue very recently and I think we´re very close on it.
ReplyDelete